|
The following is a case study, under the voluntary
system, from the CSIRO
media release by Dr Jim Peacock on 7 September 1999.
Genetically modified plants are first developed
in the laboratory, and when scientists are satisfied with the results
they run glasshouse trials. From there, if the scientist is satisfied
with the results, they move to small field trials, about the size
of a suburban backyard, and from there to larger field trials.
Currently, a GM plant needs to be approved for
trial by the Genetic Manipulation Advisory Committee (GMAC) and
the Federal Government's Interim Office of the Gene Technology Regulator
(IOGTR). These bodies oversee the release of all genetically modified
organisms.
If the plant is being used in a food it also needs to be approved
by the Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), which regulates
food safety and is responsible for labeling of foods. An example
of the process of regulation of GM plants was the INGARD®, also
known as Bt,
cotton. The crop was developed by CSIRO
and its commercial partners to contain a new gene to protect it
against insect attacks.
Using INGARD® cotton, growers have been able to
cut pesticide
use by up to 70 per cent. But before it was approved for use the
plants had to go through many regulatory and testing stages to
assess possible risks.
The CSIRO
had to prove that the modified cotton couldn't breed with any Australian
native
plants which are related to cotton, so the gene couldn't 'escape'.
They also had to show that they had strategies in place to prevent
insects developing resistance to Bt,
the protein that protected the plants from their attack.
And since the oil from the seeds of the modified
cotton is used in cooking and to make margarine, FSANZ had to test
it to make sure there was no health risk even though the cotton
oil doesn't actually contain any genes
or protein.
|